Al-Qaida’s top operative in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, said

“We have declared a bitter war against democracy and all those who seek to enact it,’ Zarqawi announced, adding that “democracy is based on the right to choose your religion,’ and that’s “against the rule of Allah.’

Looks to me as though a different voice is speaking here…the Voice of God…the God that believes in freedom, not Allah. Today I am privately celebrating for an Iranian friend of mine, a Kurd, whose father was murdered under the Ayatollah Khoemeini. It is my hope that all of the kurds in Iraq will be breathing a little bit easier today and in the future. And for all the people who were tortured, and opporessed under Saddam, this is a good day. God bless all those who’ve lost their lives–both under Saddam’s regime, and in the fight against the terrorists. It’s not over, but this is a huge accomplishment for the Iraqi people and their future.

“I came here to vote for our goal, which is freedom,” said Abu Ahmed, a 55-year-old Shiite voter in Baqouba north of Baghdad.

Iraqis risk their lives to vote click here

Expatriates Rejoice as Voting Begins

Expatriates Voting

Iraqis Express Pride, Hope at Election

“This is democracy,” the elderly woman said proudly, holding up a thumb stained with the purple ink used to mark those who had voted. “This is the first day I feel freedom.”

Condi: Election Going Better Than Expected

Rice praised the bravery of Iraqi voters and acknowledged “there are going to be many, many difficult days ahead.”

“What we are seeing here is the emergence of an Iraqi voice of freedom,” Rice said in the first response to the election from the Bush administration.

“No, it’s not a perfect election,” Rice conceded, but she called it a positive development no one had foreseen three years ago when Saddam Hussein was still the dictator of Iraq.

Rice spoke Sunday morning less than an hour before the Iraqi poll closing.

Iraqi voters queue outside a polling station in the capital Baghdad January 30, 2005. Millions of Iraqis flocked to vote in a historic election Sunday, defying insurgents who killed 25 people in bloody attacks aimed at wrecking the poll. Iraqis, some ululating with joy, others hiding their faces in fear, voted in much higher-than-expected numbers in their first multi-party election in half a century. USAF Photo by MSgt Dave Ahlschwede

With tears rolling down her eyes, a veiled Iraqi woman shows off her finger stained with blue ink and a small card reading ‘Elect Iraq after she cast her vote in a polling station in Amman, January 30, 2005

A group of Iraqi Kurds celebrate their country’s national elections outside a polling station in the northern city of Kirkuk, January 30, 2005.

Iraqi Shi’ite women line up to participate in their country’s national elections, outside a polling station in the holy city of Najaf, January 30, 2005.

Terry Turner recently visited both Cao’s Blog and the Wide Awakes Website, touting the mantra, that he’s “watching Washington” and wants to hold the republicans responsible. You can see his blog here.

Yet, there is a vast array of evidence on the net that he’s watching out for the dems interests, and is trolling conservative websites, leaving less-than civil messages and even sending rude emails.

Interestingly enough, when he tried to gain entry to the Wide Awakes discussion forum and we denied him entry, he sent me this email:

Always a pleasure to talk to a right winger whose views border on facist beliefs is silencing debate.

Good day to you as well.

Now here is where it gets interesting. The Wide Awakes group is not an ignorant bunch of hicks, you know. Here’s a link to our rules of Engagement, here’s a link to our statement of purpose. We encourage debate, but that’s not the purpose of our forum. We welcome dissenting opinions on our blog, it only makes us better at what we’re trying to accomplish.

It was pointed out to me by one of our astute bloggers, Ogre, from Ogres Politics and views, who did a little research on this guy’s website:

20,000 page views? I’m not buying that one. Ranked #9035 in the ecosystem, inbound unique links: 5 (all links from left sites). Technorati shows 75 links from 15 sources. No sitemeter counter displayed. Maybe he hits reload a lot.

Seems like this guy is a little “stuck on himself” when he stretches numbers that are so easy to verify.

Beth, at My Vast Rightwing Conspiracy, had this to say about hiim:

Eff him. I have no patience for people who live to pick fights. Ask him if he’s ever heard of the Alliance, the Watchers of Weasels, the Right Wing Attack Squad, the Command Post, Milbloggers or any one of the multitude of other groups (I won’t even bother with the lefty ones, because I can’t name one off the top of my head)…for the most part, blog groups or group blogs are for the like minded to work together. If he wants to “debate,” he can use his own bandwidth to do so, or (politely) leave a comment at Wide Awakes. My thinking is that the forum is more along the lines of the Rottweilers’ chat room (although anyone can get in there, leftards wouldn’t last long if they tried). Friendly talk among the like-minded.

Oh, and tell him “stifle” is not spelled “stiffle". Sorry, I had to say that because I think he sounds like an asshat.

And she was pretty strong on this because she continues

Like I said, eff him. I agree, there’s no way he gets 20K visits a day unless he hits refresh a lot! (LOL) Besides, what kind of debate would it be if he’s already resorted to name-calling ("facist"–nice spelling, AGAIN). What a jerk–what makes him think HIS point of view is either “sharp” or “accurate"? I’m halfway tempted to say let him in so I can chew him up and spit him out. Dumbass.

He has the habit of attempting to spread disinformation as was published some time ago on the Club For Growth blog.

Don’t swallow what this guy is telling you, he stretches the facts until they’re out and out lies, and he’s a name-calling dem who masquerades as someone who’s trying to hold Washington responsible-when, in fact, he’s one of those extreme dems who considers republicans fascists, much like the George Soros breed of socialists who’ve taken over the democratic party who call people “racist” without even knowing their name.

IMO, he not only sounds like an asshat, he’s proven himself to be one. Nuff said.

Naseer Flayih Hasan wrote this piece published at Frontpage magazine. You can see it here.

I had befriended a French reporter who had begun to realize that the situation in Iraq was not how the international media or the so-called “peace camp” described it. I noticed, however, that whenever he tried to voice his doubts to colleagues, they argued that he was wrong. Soon afterwards, I met a Dutch woman on Mutinabi Street, where booksellers lay out their wares on Friday morning. I asked her how long she’d been in Iraq and, through a translator, she answered, “Three months.”

“So you were here during the war?”

“Yes!” she said. “To see the crimes of the Americans!”

I was stunned. After a moment, I replied, “What about the crimes of the regime? It killed millions of Iraqis. Do you know that if the regime was still in power, the conversation we’re having now would result in our torture or death?”

Her face turned red and she angrily responded, “Soon will come the day that the Americans will do worse.” She then went on to accuse me of not knowing what the true facts were in Iraq—and that she could see the situation better than me!

She was not the only “humanitarian” who expressed such outrageous opinions. One afternoon, I was speaking to some members of the American anti-war group “Voices in the Wilderness.” One of the group’s members declared that the Iraqi Governing Council (then in power at the time) were “traitors.” I was shocked. Most of the Council were people whom we Iraqis knew had suffered and sacrificed in a long struggle against the regime. Some represented opposition parties who had lost ten of thousand of members in that struggle. Others came from families who had lost up to 30 loved ones to the Baathists.

After those, and many other, experiences, we finally comprehended how little we had in common with these “peace activists” who constantly decried American crimes, and hated to listen to us talk about the terrible long nightmare that ended with the collapse of the regime. We came to understand how these “humanitarians” experienced a sort of pleasure when terrorists or former remnants of the regime created destruction in Iraq—just so they could feel that they were right, and the Americans wrong!

Cao’s Note: This is an Iraqi talking about his beloved Iraq. It’s just another example of how the left twists what is happening in Iraq–even when they’re living in Iraq–the unmitigated hubris to lecture Iraqis who suffered under Saddam about the terrorist “freedom fighters” noble cause. I can’t even imagine this–happening right in Iraq itself. I’ve witnessed it as leftists from all over the world have left stupid statements like that on this blog…but this is beyond the imagination.

If you have a browser like firefox, then you can’t see the video that’s playing on the front of the site.

This is a very disturbing presentation of the state of the Democratic party.

In the beginning, it’s very funny, when the people are being interviewed about what happened with the election. But then it turns…and it’s very disturbing to learn that they’re talking about a “revolution".

Click here

My thanks to Raven at And Rightly So!, and Instapundit.

5:33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; [Anyone who disbeliefs in Islam and speaks against it is considered to be waging war against Allah and his messenger]

Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, “protected people,” are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur’an’s command that they “feel themselves subdued” (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race. It’s called building a bridge to the 8th century.

If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it.

Spearheaded by dhimmi academics and self-serving advocacy groups, that same attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, school textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today. To do so would endanger chances for peace and rapprochement between civilizations all too ready to clash.

But in this era of global terrorism it must be said: this silence, this distortion, has become deadly. Before 9/11 it was easy to ignore and whitewash dhimmitude, but the atrocities changed the situation forever. In jihads throughout history, untold millions have died. Tens of millions have been uprooted from their homes. Tens of millions have been stripped of their cultural identity. To continue to gloss over the destruction wrought by jihad ideology and its attendant evil of dhimmitude is today to play into the hands of jihadists, who have repeatedly vowed to dhimmify the West and destroy any recalcitrant elements. While jihadist groups, even with their global diffusion, are not strong enough to realize this goal by themselves, they have a potent and destructive ally, a genuine fifth column, in the dhimmi academics and dhimmi journalists they have recruited in the West. They have succeeded in confusing millions in the West into mistaking honesty and truthfulness for bigotry, and self-defense for oppression.

From Robert Spencer’s Dhimmi Watch and Faith Freedom, the website of the ex Muslim Movement, whose members are warning us of the dangers of Islam.

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Russ sent this to me, and it just seemed as though he was watching Cao’s blog over the last few days…this piece is worth a read, and yes, we’re gonna give ‘em hell! click here for Ann’s “Liberals Love America Like OJ Loved Nicole”

Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole.

As Ann Coulter said, bless her scathing sharp soul,
Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole.
Sad words those may be, but with ire they must fill us,
If the Left can’t control us, they’d just as soon kill us.

It’s a madness you see, coming full to the fore,
Since they lost every battle of 2004.
The weaker seek shrinks while the blamers point fingers,
And the madness just festers, the lunacy lingers.

They had trusted John Kerry to lead from above,
But the problem with that was his hand fit the glove.
And the Swift Boat detectives took us far back in time,
Shining their hard bright light on the Perp and his crime.

The psychosis blooms full and the future’s not rosy,
As long as they’re led by the likes of Pelosi.
The symptoms are glaring, prognosis is poor
Till enmasse, they pass, their worm, Michael Moore.

So the Left can’t win fairly, can’t win at the poll?
Then they’ll seek other ways to defeat and control.
Undermine our elections, give aid to our foe,
To debase, to deface, a Nicole-U.S. Ho.’

O.J. had a jury that saw it his way,
But believe me you Lefties, it’s come a new day,
Red State America sits the main jury seat
And for your socialist goals, that spells jury defeat.

If you believe as I do, O.J. murdered Nicole,
Then you believe as I do, he was out of control.
Like crazed Lefties stabbing at our nation’s heart,
He was crazy with loss, acting stupid, not smart.

Will America share the same fate as Nicole?
Slashed, shattered and battered for resisting control?
No, Nicole-America has punch in her Right,
And this time Juice Lefties,
THIS BLONDE’S GONNA FIGHT!

Russ Vaughn

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Back when Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq, seven merchants were found guilty of using U.S. dollars instead of Iraqi dinars and were punished by having their right hands chopped off and X’s tattooed on their foreheads. The link to this story went dead. You can see it here. You can see the main site here. Yeah riiiight. Had a hiccup. I should have swiped the picture of that guy when I had the chance because there’s a lot of evidence that’s having ‘a hiccup’.

In Islamic culture, having a right hand cut off is a severe form of public shame. For Saddam’s regime, sending Iraqis back into public without a hand reinforced the former dictator’s harsh rule.

But for seven Iraqi men, nine years of public shame are finally over.

These men went to Houston to undergo rehabilitation. Through plastic surgery, the black X’s are gone from their foreheads and they all now have state-of-the-art prosthetic right hands, which once again allows them to do simple things like tying their shoes.

“They all cried and had tears in their eyes when they put these on,” said David Baty, director of prosthetics at Dynamic Orthotics and Prosthetics in Houston.

The prosthetic hands work with what’s called myoelectric technology.

Electric sensors in the forearm read electric pulses in their muscles to then open, close and squeeze.

“We have a lot of gifts from God,” said Dr. Sabah al Rubayi, the Iraqi doctor who flew with the men to Houston. “We have two eyes and we don’t know the benefit of two eyes unless we missed one eye.”

What has struck the amputees most about their trip to America is simply that they have the freedom to share their thoughts and say what they want without fear of reprisal.

A grateful Baasim says: “I have learned that the most important thing in America is freedom. Freedom is worth any sacrifice.”

Cross posted to The Wide Awakes

here are a few links to what I can still find

Amputees arrive for treatment

Hands of horror, hands of hope

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

The name of this piece should have been: Mike Whitney and his friends, the enemies among us. Let me introduce you to the man behind the curtain: Mike Whitney, of the 44th District in Washington State. Take note, Shannon, if you’re listening. Mike is another great example, while I’m on the theme of leftists and their Anti-American sentiments and how they’re supporting terrorists at home. Mike Whitney, of Washington State,aka the Agg Pro or he may have moved to this site, is an admitted, even proud member of the ACLU, and although he is grammar and spelling-challenged, he is more widely published than anyone could imagine. When he came over here bragging about how published he is, I had no idea because I don’t take it upon myself to frequent The Smirking Chimp, Counterpunch or the Catalyst Journal. It’s no wonder he didn’t go any further with his admissions, because he knew full well they wouldn’t be well-received. You think I’m kidding about people like Kevin Sites who reporting ON BEHALF OF Al Jazeera? Take a look at this one. The thing that’s pathetic to me is Kevin Sites was probably threatened (maybe tortured) to do it, because it wasn’t long after his capture that the famous footage he took of the marine killing the terrorist was released by Al Jazeera. (Sites’ bio says he was captured by Iraqi Fedayeen militia outside Tikrit while traveling with Kurdish fighters and spent four hours in captivity before being released.)

Mike Whitney, however, from the comfort of his own home, does it for free. It’s like John Kerry lying to the Winter Soldier investigation. Only Whitney was never in Iraq. So I can only imagine he’s one of those guys who’s too much of a coward to actually participate in the terrorist activities himself; so he lives vicariously through the terrorists themselves.

I just want to make a comment on this picture before I go on. It sums up my sentiments on how we’re fighting this war and how the terrorists do it; but just remember. Behind that terrorist, cheering them on (even more of a coward than the terrorist hiding behind that woman), are people like Mike Whitney.

Actually, I don’t see that he’s a credible testament to anything except for one thing: there are people inside the US who are cheering for the enemy and there are activists like Mike Whitney who are working alongside them to help them achieve their goals.

Cases in point: here, here but remember that this article is linked here, and there is even more here, here and here and he’s also called for us to disarm our military (or is that abandon the whole concept of defending ourselves?), here.

I must really be getting under the skin of these idiots because Joe Lieberman himself paid my site a visit-you can see his site here.

Now that I’ve put this picture together, it is no wonder that I’ve been receiving personal emails from lawyers congratulating me on what I’ve been putting up over here. When I first started receiving these emails, I thought maybe it was related to pieces like The Top Ten Leftist Americans which featured Lynne Stewart and Brian Becker and then later, Ramsey Clark-Still Saddam’s Sock Puppet, (still referring to Lynne Stewart). To me, these are prime examples of the war on terrorism that is being fought right here at home and describes exactly how these people are siding with the enemy. The socialist “Hate America” crowd sees our existing system as evil imperialism, they cry out for the deformed children that we’ve supposedly hurt with American chemicals (but they are wrong; Saddam did the gassing), and even the ridiculous assumption that we’re harvesting organs from dead Iraqis. I made fun of that assumption here, but you have to know that there are Americans who are claiming it’s true and they’re claiming that the American government and Bush are guilty of war crimes–it’s literally like listening to the lying voice of Bin Laden (only in English).

If you have any conversations with criminal lawyers, including members of what might be called the “terror bar” (e.g. the ACLU), you will find many of them less decisive in Stewart’s defense than the public chorus suggests. Carl Herman spent 1 1/2 years fighting to keep Mohammed Saddiq Odeh from receiving the death penalty for the Nairobi Embassy bombing. He waited for the day when Odeh would have a change of heart, but it never came. On Sept. 11 Herman lost a friend in one of the towers. A few weeks later he had to visit Odeh in the downtown Metropolitan Correctional Center, and Herman discovered he couldn’t even look his client in the eye. Afterward he heard that the embassy bombers, when told what the loud noise at the World Trade Center was, exchanged thumbs up. Herman has sworn off defending terrorists. ‘’We’re not talking about phony revolutionaries, or Mafia guys, or nuts,'’ he says. ‘’These guys are really dedicated to wiping out me and my family. I can just find something else to do with my time.'’

Even Ron Kuby, a strong defender of Stewart, had a change of heart on many things since Sept. 11. He now regrets having defended El Sayyid A. Nosair, accused of killing the Jewish extremist Meir Kahane. When Sattar, the sheik’s paralegal, was arrested along with Stewart, Kuby was ready to represent him at the bail hearing, until Kuby’s wife said, ‘’You don’t know what he was doing.'’ Kuby reached a decision: ‘’I sure as hell don’t think people who would take my family, put them in purdah and put me up against a wall and shoot me are entitled to my support in that struggle.'’

The key to understanding the ACLU lies in a single word — ideology.

Ideology is the attempt to account for the vast complexity of politics and society by using only a few rarified concepts. The ideologue seizes on a handful of abstractions and then claims everything else must somehow conform to them.

To see how the ACLU is helping terrorists and defending their rights to do WHATEVER, the American Communist Lawyers Union’s (the true meaning behind the acronym) batch of press releases around August of 2004, insists that they will never check their new hires against terrorism watch lists. (mind you, this is just one example, for the sake of conversation.)

The problem for the ACLU is that they already signed an agreement to use the watch lists in order to obtain nearly $500,000 from the Combined Federal Campaign, as required by the USA PATRIOT Act. The CFC is an agency which dispenses charitable donations from federal and state employees to more than 2,000 non-profit groups, which totals some $250 million per year.

The ACLU, however, despite all its bluster about the Constitution, apparently has little use for contract law. They decided to simply disregard the list. And they probably would have gotten away with it if they could have kept their egos in check. But that, of course, is quite impossible for these pompous asses, and soon ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero was announcing to the world on NPR that while he’d printed out the watch lists, he’d “never consulted them.” Furthermore, he had no intention of doing so.

When CFC Director Mara Patermaster pointed out in the New York Times that the ACLU was willfully violating government policy, the ACLU actually voted to heed the agreement and collect their cash. Then Romero, seemingly unable to repress any rash impulse whatsoever, pulled out of the agreement entirely, and began screaming the ACLU’s favorite word from the rooftops, one so integral to the martyr myth the group was built on—"blacklist.”

“It is increasingly clear that the Patriot Act and the government’s ‘war on terror’ are threatening the ability of America’s non-profit charities to do their essential work,” Romero wrote in a letter to Patermaster. “By requiring non-profit charities to check their employees against a ‘blacklist’ in order to receive donations from the CFC, you are furthering a climate of fear and intimidation that undermines the health and well-being of this nation.”

Now it must be conceded that, yes, the government is seeking a “blacklist” here. According to the U.S. State Department, the government is seeking a “blacklist” on those who have committed or threatened to commit the following actions: “hijacking or sabotage of an aircraft, vessel, vehicle or other conveyance; hostage taking; a violent attack on an internationally protected person; assassination; or the use of any biological agent, chemical agent, nuclear weapon or device, or explosive, firearm, or other weapon or dangerous device (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.”

Essentially, the ACLU is being asked to not hire those who seek to murder large numbers of Americans. Perhaps it should surprise us that the ACLU is reluctant to agree to such a request. But even the radicals over at the ACLU know how this must sound to the average American and are using all sorts of permutations to attempt to make it more palatable.

For example, in an ACLU press release on the matter the group contended that the terrorism watch lists were a sham because they had pulled a single name from the list—Julio Ramirez–and found hundreds of people across the nation with the same name. “Any non-profit that employs a Julio Ramirez would now be obligated to ask potentially intrusive questions about his personal life and beliefs,” the ACLU lectures.

If you aren’t a terrorist, is it really going to be such a big deal to go ahead and say you aren’t one? Does saying you do not, in fact, want to murder Americans sound like too much of a “loyalty oath” for the folks over at the ACLU? If a certain six foot eight, bearded man applied for a position at the ACLU, would it be too much to ask Anthony Romero to inquire as to whether the Osama before him was one and the same with the Osama currently sought in the mass murder of September 11? Or would that be “potentially intrusive"?

Unfortunately, the hysteria has spread, and the ACLU is not alone in seeking what amounts to a Right to Work law for terrorists. They have been joined by a coalition that includes such lefty luminaries as the Advocacy Institute, Amnesty International, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the NAACP, the National Women’s Law Center, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and Sierra Club.

Some of the claims by these other groups rivals even the crudely ludicrous rhetoric of the ACLU. For example, Barbara Brenner, Executive Director of Breast Cancer Action, has embarrassed herself by going on-record saying that checking terrorism watch lists “forced” her organization “to choose between accepting these restrictions"—i.e., not hiring terrorists—"and putting federal employees’ contributions to good use to help women confronting a life-threatening illness.”

So now a stand against providing terrorists jobs is the equivalent of supporting breast cancer? Not to most Americans, I’d bet. Permanent victimhood is the bread and butter of groups like the ACLU, PETA, the Sierra Club, and, now apparently, Breast Cancer Action. Heroes and legends in their own minds, they’ve become rich by embracing Blame America First mentality on every major social and policy issue our country has faced. Protecting terrorists in the midst of the War on Terror is but a continuation of this philosophy which for the average Joe like me, is an EXTREME CONCERN.

For this and so many other reasons, we must get the ACLU off the taxpayer dole. I sure as hell don’t want to be paying any portion whatsoever of my tax money to these assholes to defend terrorists anywhere in this country. And hey Joe and Mike–you can go to hell, because if you think we’re going to sit still for this, you’ve got another thing coming. You’re seeing to it that one day soon someone will have the privilege of hearing “allah akbar"! after some tragic event on our soil, just like the people did on those planes on 9/11. I hope you’re within earshot; because you will be personally responsible.

This is a picture taken of the Tsunami aftermath. Seeing this picture makes me wonder if these people would have the same sympathy for my countrymen, and my country, under different circumstances, or if he yelled “allah akbar” on 9/11. I wonder if a handful of American aid dollars might get him to discard his tattered bin Laden shirt – or merely buy a new one. I wonder if he thinks the Arab League should be sending him aid instead of infidel Americans. This is the problem I have with the world insisting that we help. To me, that another face of the enemy.

Does this man consider American Capitalism his worst enemy? And George Bush? It’s worthy of consideration. We are a nation at war, and we should not, under any circumstances IMHO, be helping sympathizers to the cause of the enemy. And that means–here at home, as well.

Cross-Posted to It Is What It Is

First, you should visit this website.

A fellow calling himself “Cecil” was kind enough to shared this with us. I emailed him to make sure it was ok with him to put this out there:

In the last couple of years I have had to do a great deal of thinking about where the party (Democrat), I have been a member of for so many years, has been heading. I have looked at the facts available to me and who is pushing to the forefront of our party. I have become sickened with the knowledge we have allowed a certain group to use us and make their beliefs the beliefs of the Mainstream Democrat Party. At 58 I have come to certain conclusions, based on available facts, that compel me to write the following:

Left-wing (Liberal) versus Right-wing (Conservative)

Left-wing (Liberal) – groups of people or individuals who support or believe in the Marxist/Socialist form of government. These are people who advocate the overthrow of the United States as a Democratic (not talking about the party) Society by any means.

These are people who believe in the overthrow of the American Constitution as the only way to obtain their goals. Any means (attacks on the government, organizations or individuals i.e. Kent State Bombing during the Vietnam War or the Oklahoma City Bombing) to achieve their goals are to be used.

Therefore, even if it is considered wrong by a majority of American citizens any act which furthers their aims/goals is good. Most often, these people use a form of rhetoric (listen closely and you can hear the echoes of Marx, Engel, and Stalin) to denounce the “Government lies” and blame America for starting it or say “America is getting just what it deserves from the 9/11 attack”. Their name calling has changed over the years from an outspoken communistic rhetoric to the much more subtle “politically correct, do not blame the poor unfortunates or they are kept in ignorance so please be careful what you say about them” type of pap. The liberal element of the US has a tendency to swallow this pap hook-line-sinker and have taken this left-wing pap as their own creed.

Right-wing (Conservative) – groups of people or individuals who support and believe in the American Constitution and the laws of the United States. Who do not believe that any means is OK to further their goals/aims but try to stay within the framework of the law of this country. Conservative means just what it says, this group is attempting to conserve the America Constitution from attempts to dilute or change it in a manner that is against the way that the majority of Americans feel it should be. These people have been much more consistent in their approach. The same arguments used during the Vietnam War to defend the beliefs of the majority of the US citizens are being used today to defend the right for America to strike against the regimes that support terrorist and terrorist attacks on the US. At least these people have not flip-flopped back and forth like so many of the Liberals have done.

If someone wants to point out some extreme groups are right-wing (i.e. the retards of Waco), well they are wrong. An extremist is someone who has gone beyond the norm to further his (or his small group’s) beliefs, which do not reflect the beliefs of the majority. That is like saying the “Black Panthers” are part of the Liberal Mainstream Democrat Party. Extremist groups have always considered themselves above or beyond the laws. Extremist groups have a track record of providing the majority of terrorist around the world.

No doubt, some will take offense to my equating Left-wing Marxist/Socialist to the Liberals. I have news for these people, all we have to do is look at who claim to be “good” Mainstream Liberals/Democrats to note that liberalism is just a front for the Marxist/Socialistic elements. To name a few:

Jane (Hanoi Jane) Fonda
Leslie Cagan
Rep. Barbara Lee
Rep. James McDermott
Michael Moore Oliver Stone
Brian Becker
Stanley Cohen
Lynne Stewart
William Kunstler
Rep. Mike Thompson

These are some of the people who have supported and admire communistic regimes and their leaders or dictatorships like the Saddam reign and they are self professed “good” Liberals /Democrats.

What’s the most disturbing fact, to me, is “the Mainstream (Liberal) Democrat Party is too stupid to understand that people like this are using the party to further their goals at the expense of the American People. The liberals can say anything they want to about the conservatives but when a conservative answers back in kind the liberals pout and say the conservatives are not being “Politically Correct”.

I, for one, do not feel that everything President Bush has done is right or even if it is right that he did it properly! Yes, he is not as smooth as many who speak against him and he fumbles for the right words (and drops the ball) at times but I also believe history will show that he was a man who did the best he could. If you do not believe that the troops really should be in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, then fine. But when you fail to support those troops (not considering why they are there but the fact that they are America Men & Women following orders of the Commander-in-Chief of all America Armed Forces) that is treason in the eyes of more than 95% of the people who has served this country in the military.

For all you Liberal Bleeding Heart Politically Correct (Left-wing Marxist Socialistic) anti-American, ignorant, gullible, Democraps out there I renounce the Democrat party and the left-wing philosophy you stand for. My last two words for the Democrat party, I have been a member of for so many years and now renounce, is “Kiss it”

America troops are America Men and Women deserving our support.

Support our Troops!!

Moveon.org, mwahahaha is telling libs they need to f***k more, I just can’t stand it. bwhahahahahaha!

As per Matt Margolis, here.

Conservative religious families have four to six children. Liberal families who are concerned about population control and the environment might have two, one or none.

Conservatives are better at it, apparently than the metrosexual crowd who’s afraid to get their hair mussed up–click here. But then, the ones who want Cherry cabinets in their kitchen and want to drive a Bentley couldn’t give two spits about having kids. Having kids is for people with VALUES, who want to see their progeny live on, and don’t care who sees them shopping at Walmart.

The libs may be better at having sex with a flavor of the month who might have STDS or AIDS, which isn’t anything to brag about, that’s why they have to be more careful.

hahahahahaha

What’s the answer? Liberals need to f**k more. Well, they probably already do f**k more, they just are more conscientious about using condoms, the patch, the pill or, when it is in the interest of the mother, considering abortion as an option.

There’s proof positive that the dimwits consider abortion a positive form of birth control. Let’s breed ‘em further into extinction, in our safe, monogamous relationships.

Idiots.

Here’s a thought along the same lines via the Sandmonkey. It’s the solution to terrorism, and it’s the liberal Bill Maher. Thanks, Leanne. This is too hilarious.

If we really want to stop terrorism, we have to get Muslim men laid. Five British Muslims who were recently sent home from our prison at Guantanamo, charge that their American captors brought in prostitutes to taunt them, because most had never even seen a naked woman before.

And it made me wonder how many members of Al Qaeda have even dated a girl? We should hire women to infiltrate Al Qaeda cells and f**k them. Things would change quickly because young Muslim men don’t really hate America. They’re jealous of America. We have rap videos and the Hilton sisters and magazines with titles like Barely Legal. You know what’s “barely legal” in Afghanistan? Everything!